That said, it should be noted that something else that needs to be considered is the pressure response.
BEST GRAPHIC TABLET FOR MAC 10.10 SERIES
Of course, if your line of work absolutely demands that you have 8192 pressure levels, then the XP-Pen Deco series of tablets might be better for you. Most artists are quite comfortable with 4096 pressure levels, and 8192 can feel like overkill.
Unless you’re looking very closely, it’s highly unlikely that you’ll notice a pressure difference between a Wacom Stylus and an XP-Pen stylus. While 8192 pressure levels are twice as many as 4096, the difference is barely noticeable in practice. After all, more pressure is better, right? It would seem that, in this case, the XP-Pen is a clear winner. The stylus on the Wacom Intuos comes with a pressure range of 4096 levels compared with the XP-Pen’s pressure range of 8192 levels. The XP-Pen Deco 03’s build quality and specifications are up there with the market leaders. …enjoy! Wacom Intuos vs XP-Pen Deco series In a hurry?…Įrgonomically this is an excellent light weight tablet with a predictable output and several express keys and a handy dial to help with workflow.
By the end, you should have a clear sense of which would be best for you, given your current needs.Īdditionally, we also pitch Wacom against several other of the market leaders in our articles below: In this article, we shall compare Wacom and XP-Pen on two fronts: graphics tablets and drawing tablets, looking at the things each excels in. While XP-Pen tablets are generally cheaper than Wacom tablets and have more features, Wacom tablets tend to have more of a premium and durable build, and a lot more brand recognition.
Both manufacture graphics tablets and drawing tablets and have different strong and weak points. Two particular heavyweights are Wacom and XP-Pen. It’s easy to feel overwhelmed by the abundance of options. Whether you’re looking for a graphics tablet or a drawing tablet, there are lots of options on the market, and they are probably all pretty compelling.
0 kommentar(er)
